🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are channeling massive amounts into what's termed “sovereign AI” – building their own AI models. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are racing to develop AI that grasps local languages and local customs.

The Global AI Battle

This initiative is part of a broader worldwide race dominated by tech giants from the US and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and a social media giant pour substantial capital, developing countries are likewise taking their own investments in the AI landscape.

However amid such vast investments involved, is it possible for less wealthy states achieve significant benefits? As stated by a specialist from a well-known research institute, Except if you’re a wealthy nation or a big corporation, it’s a significant burden to develop an LLM from scratch.”

Defence Considerations

Many nations are hesitant to rely on external AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, Western-developed AI tools have occasionally been insufficient. One case featured an AI agent employed to educate pupils in a isolated area – it interacted in the English language with a strong Western inflection that was difficult to follow for regional users.

Then there’s the defence factor. For India’s defence ministry, relying on particular international systems is viewed unacceptable. According to a entrepreneur noted, There might be some arbitrary data source that may state that, oh, a certain region is outside of India … Using that certain system in a military context is a major risk.”

He added, “I have spoken to individuals who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on US platforms because information may be transferred abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

As a result, some nations are funding domestic ventures. A particular such a project is in progress in the Indian market, in which a firm is striving to create a national LLM with state funding. This effort has committed approximately $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The developer envisions a system that is more compact than leading systems from Western and Eastern firms. He states that the nation will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with talent. Based in India, we don’t have the advantage of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus such as the enormous investments that the United States is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the brain game comes in.”

Native Emphasis

In Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting language models developed in the region's local dialects. These tongues – such as Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are commonly inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the experts who are creating these national AI systems were informed of the extent to which and how quickly the cutting edge is moving.

A senior director involved in the initiative notes that these models are intended to enhance more extensive systems, rather than substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he says, frequently struggle with local dialects and cultural aspects – communicating in unnatural Khmer, as an example, or recommending non-vegetarian meals to Malay users.

Developing native-tongue LLMs enables state agencies to incorporate local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated tool created in other countries.

He continues, I am prudent with the word national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we want to be more adequately included and we want to understand the capabilities” of AI systems.

Cross-Border Cooperation

Regarding states trying to find their place in an growing worldwide landscape, there’s another possibility: collaborate. Experts connected to a well-known institution put forward a public AI company allocated across a consortium of developing countries.

They term the project “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from the European effective strategy to create a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. This idea would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would merge the resources of several nations’ AI initiatives – such as the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to create a viable alternative to the American and Asian major players.

The lead author of a report outlining the initiative states that the idea has attracted the interest of AI ministers of at least three nations to date, along with a number of national AI firms. Although it is presently focused on “middle powers”, developing countries – Mongolia and Rwanda included – have also shown curiosity.

He comments, In today’s climate, I think it’s simply reality there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the existing US administration. Individuals are wondering such as, can I still depend on any of this tech? In case they decide to